0f, &mesh, NULL); Win32 DirectX Graphics Discussions D3DXMatrixLookAtLH (1) D3DXMatrixRotationY (1) D3DXCreateCylinder (1) OnD3D9FrameRender (1) XP (1) IDirect3DDevice9 (1) DrawIndexedPrimitive (1) UnlockVertexBuffer (1) [Please do not mail me a copy of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
Maintainence C++ / VB Hi All We have a mixture of Windows 200 SP4 and Windows XP SP3 Domain Workstations on our network. Currently a lot of them are experiencing slow performance via VBScript. Does anybody have thoughts or ideas about this. Regards D VBScript Discussions Windows XP (1) Windows Update (1) Windows 7 (1) Vista (1) VBScript (1) SOHo (1) Maintainence (1 am not sure about automating defrag, but that is unlikely to have an effect, anyway. XP, especially, is prone to sluggishness. But it does not have to be if you clean it is free, VBScript-based): www.jsware.net / jsware / xpfix.php5 I find that once XP is cleaned up it runs better than Win9x on the same hardware. But a default when provided with extra RAM. Workstations have Read here: "How To Schedule Tasks in Windows XP" at http: / / support.microsoft.com / kb / 308569 However I doubt very much that running Disk other than services), with options to toggle the setting. The link above is for an XP+ version, but I would guess there are still copies of a 2000-compatible version around Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup Interesting. . .My copy of Windows XP is more than seven years old, and it is fast and reliable. - -- Leonard Grey Errare those things can slow it down substantially. Although both of those problems are common, Windows XP should not be blamed for the sluggishness that results from them. - - Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP
XP increased processor utilization C++ / VB I am working on a multi-threaded, statically linked MFC is two fold. The first is that in general running the same application under Windows XP SP2 uses more processing power than when running under Windows 2K SP4(about 8% or an increase of CPU utilization (according to Task Manager & Perfmon) that is significantly higher under XP. Under 2K, similar movement of the mouse results in a 1-3% increase of processor utilization. Under XP, the processor utilization jumps 10-25%. I'm fairly confident that the problem is not could be related to MFC, Win32, or potentially something else. Shaun VC MFC Discussions Windows XP (1) Windows Server (1) Vista (1) XP (1) SendMessageToDescendents (1) SendMessageToDescendants (1) AfxCallWndProc (1) AfxGetMainWnd (1) Well, 8% is within error bounds though it appears his analysis is fairly accurate. Anyone here have any thoughts on why XP would handle the SendMessageToDescendants of the WM_IDLEUPDATECMDUI message so poorly compared to 2K? Also, any deleting or the frequency of those objects well enough to make an informed decision. Shaun XP itself is probably part of the culprit. Somewhere under the Start menu is a command