C++/VB - Unknown IP address
Asked By Morris
10-Mar-10 01:52 PM
I have to communicate from my PC with a device that runs Windows XP, has no
keybord and disply. Problem is that I do not know its ip address. I thout to
run WIreshark on my PC but I do not know whats the best ip address and mask
that I should set in my PC to asure that the sniffer would "see" the
packets.
Can someone advise please?
Regards
Morris
Windows XP
(1)
WIreshark
(1)
NotokStart
(1)
Ipaddress
(1)
Sniffer
(1)
Keybord
(1)
Subnet
(1)
Asure
(1)
mosesvas replied to Morris
no
to
k
Start wireshark & reboot the device. When device starts it should send
gratuitous ARP which has the ipaddress. Provide a ipaddress in that
subnet range to access the device.
Morris replied to mosesvas
Thanks mosesvas,
It seems like a greate idea, but would the sniffer discover the gratuitous
ARP no matter its PC's ip address and mask?
Regards
Morris
Start wireshark & reboot the device. When device starts it should send
gratuitous ARP which has the ipaddress. Provide a ipaddress in that
subnet range to access the device.
andrewmasud masud replied to Morris
thank's for your information
disable UDP Checksum Offload C++ / VB I develop some woftware under Windows Vista and DotNet 2.0. It sends UDP packets to an XP macjine across the LAN. When code runs in Vista I get with in the sniffer running in the XP machine a checksum error and some hint that I may need to disable UDP Checksum Offload(Another XP which also sends packets causes, no problem) Can anyone advice how to do that? Regards James Win32 Networks Discussions Windows XP (1) Windows Vista (1) XP (1) Wireshark (1) Checksum (1) Woftware (1) Macjine (1) Sniffer (1) Hi all, I figured
TCP simultaneous (SYN) open with XP Prof SP2 C++ / VB I tested 'TCP Simultaneous (SYN) open' with Windows XP Professional Version 2002 Service Pack 2. After receiving SYN-ACK packet from remote host, connection packet to each other. (Causes SYN_SENT to SYN_RECVD transition) I would like to know if Windows XP SP2 supports the simultaneous open as RFC 793 suggests. Here is what's happening: (Wireshark is used to capture packets on the wire) There are two hosts, Host-A and client is written in C++ using winsock2. Thanks, Win32 Networks Discussions Visual Studio .NET (1) Windows XP (1) Windows Update (1) Linux (1) Vista (1) XP (1) NATs (1) OSs (1) I
Windows 2003SP2 Socket Sends are much slower than Windows XP on my C++ / VB I have a client / server C# 2.0 winforms app that a factor of 6 times slower. + Why is Win2003 SP2 sensitive to the buffersize while XP is not? After evaluating a wireshark network trace, the packets sent from the Win2003 looks capped at 250 packets / s and as it could, but as soon as I increase the buffer size to match the windows size of 64k, Win2003 becomes as peppy as it can be. Any insights? Btw, CYSCO that are transfering data over TCP / IP ports with buffers below 64k. Win32 Networks Discussions Windows XP (1) DDoS (1) Win2003 (1) Kesney (1) Buffersize (1) Wireshark (1) Winforms (1) Packets (1
a PGM socket not working C++ / VB I'm writing a PGM test app on Windows XP using winsock2 and the PGM implementation included with MSMQ 3.0. An app that reads it appears that the buffer contents are not making it on to the network, since Wireshark running on a different machine does not report a packet containing a PGM message. When IPPROTO_RM); to s = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP); send returns successfully as before, but this time Wireshark reports that it saw the UDP message. what am I missing? Is there some MSMQ char*) pricebuf, sizeof(pricebuf), 0); shutdown(s, SD_BOTH); closesocket(s); return 0; } Win32 Networks Discussions XP (1) PGM (1) AF_INET (1) WSADATA (1) IPPROTO_UDP (1) WSAStartup (1) G_hCleanupEvent (1) IPPROTO_RM (1 on, a, PGM, socket, not, working description: I'm writing a PGM test app on Windows XP using winsock2 and the PGM implementation included with MSMQ 3.0. An app that reads